Astrónomo.org
Astronomía · Telescopios · Astrofotografía · Observación
¡20 AÑOS ONLINE! (2006 - 2026)
Bienvenido(a),
Visitante
Quiero Participar
o
ingresa
Ingresar nombre de usuario, contraseña, duración de la sesión
1 Hora
1 Día
1 Semana
1 Mes
Siempre
Todos los Temas Actualizados recientes
|
Índice rápido de foros
|
en astrónomo.org
en todo subforo
en este subforo
en este tema
usuarios
Recomendando desde 2009 a:
... página cargada a fecha y hora :
288816 post, 20465 Temas, 11616 users
último usuario registrado:
Sance-
INICIO
LOGIN
CALENDARIO
LISTA
TAG'S
GALERÍA IMÁGENES
ASTROFOTOGRAFÍA
LINKS
APP'S
¿QUÉ TELESCOPIO COMPRAR?
GUÍA PARA ELEGIR BIEN
?
RSS
INICIO
/ instrumental, técnicas .../
· Automatización / Robotización de equipos, Autoguía, protocolos
Backlash vs. Anti-Stiction en Maxim Dl
Página:
[1]
* y última página *
Imprimir
Autor
astrons: votos: 0
Backlash vs. Anti-Stiction en Maxim Dl
«
: Dom, 09 Jun 2013, 01:12 UTC »
Hola! Estoy iniciando pruebas del sistema de guiado en Maxim DL, y viendo las discusiones de este foro me surgió la siguiente inquietud:
Es incompatible corregir el Backlash y tener activado el anti-sticktion en el mismo eje?
Gracias.
- - -
re.: Backlash vs. Anti-Stiction en Maxim Dl
«
respuesta #1
: Mié, 12 Jun 2013, 14:23 UTC »
https://www.cyanogen.com/help/maximdl/Autoguider_Troubleshooting.htm
ou can try experimenting with the backlash settings; however, it may be better to use the Anti-Stiction feature rather than play with backlash settings. The backlash features works by sending an extra-long pulse out to the mount whenever the declination direction reverses. The amount of time of this extra pulse is entered in seconds. Backlash compensation is usually only required on the Declination axis since the sidereal tracking normally runs out the backlash in RA. Be careful, however, not to set the backlash time too high – that will make the situation much worse. It is far better to set it too low than too high. Also make absolutely sure that any anti-backlash feature in the telescope mount controller itself is turned off. If the mount performs its own anti-backlash functions the star will still be moving when the guider takes the next exposure, and severe instability can result.
------------------>
https://www.cyanogen.com/help/maximdl/Backlash_and_Stiction.htm
Stiction problems can be complex mechanically; it can often be hard to determine what the root cause is. Many telescope mounts – even high-end models – suffer from this problem, and it may vary between different samples of the same model. The problem has a terrible effect on guiding because it forces overcorrection.
If you experience bad guiding in declination and cannot resolve it through adjusting the calibration or aggressiveness, you may have a stiction problem. One solution that works is to note the average drift in declination, and disable corrections in that direction. The guider will only be able to push against the average drift, not with it. This works surprisingly well. Some users deliberately adjust their polar alignment slightly off to ensure that the drift is in a consistent direction. You should avoid large offsets that may cause field rotation.
- - -
keywords:
Maxim DL
Backlash
Página:
[1]
* final de la última página, y fin de tema.*
Imprimir
astrons:
votos: 0
Tema leído 5732 veces
INICIO
>
/ instrumental, técnicas .../
>
· Automatización / Robotización de equipos, Autoguía, protocolos
>
Backlash vs. Anti-Stiction en Maxim Dl
Loading...